p>RX-Line: Pushing the envelop of parallelization - Hetzner Online GmbH> 19 July 2022> RX-Line: Pushing the envelop of parallelization> The new RX-line is now available and features the first Arm-based dedicated servers in Europe. The servers house an Ampere ® Altra ® Q80-30 SoC with Arm64 architecture, which gives you 80 cores of single-threaded processing power.> The new line includes two models. The RX170 is the smaller model of the two, but it still comes with 128 GB DDR4 registered ECC memory modules and 2x 960 GB NVMe SSD at the low price of ? 169 a month and ? 179 setup fee. The RX220, on the other hand, comes with impressive 256 GB DDR4 registered ECC memory modules and 2 x 3.84 TB NVMe SSD at the fair price of ? 219 a month and a setup fee of ? 229.> Where is the catch, you wonder? Only a few servers are currently available. As we work through ramping the supply chain for the RX Line, be the first to get an Ampere-based server. Over the next few months, expect further announcements of improved availability as we scale out this exciting product line.> So what are you waiting for? Order yours now, and start saving time and money on your IT infrastructure.> Check it out now> All prices excl. VAT.</p>

p>MichaelCollins? 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>It's another case of a webpage working better with javascript disabled by default. Disabling javascript fixes more websites than it breaks.</p>

p>tonightstoast 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>That is super odd - I’m wondering if they just messed up some CSS. Another win for reader mode I suppose.</p>

p>codetrotter 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Reader mode saves the day :)</p>

p>johnklos 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Misleading title. "Hetzner to offer *their* first ARM-based"...</p>

p>layer8 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>Who else already offers dedicated ARM-based servers in Europe? Just curious.Edit: …except Hetzner themselves who already did in 2015 as noted upthread.</p>

p>mnw21cam 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>There have been various hosting services that have hosted Raspberry Pi units - some of them even did this for free. I submit this in the best HN spirit of technically-correct.</p>

p>layer8 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>The best kind of correct. ;)</p>

p>puzzlingcaptcha 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Scaleway did. It was some Marvell Armada SoC IIRC.</p>

p>JeanMarcS 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>>cat /proc/cpuinfo>processor : 0>model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 1 (v7l)This is on a server I have at OVH (SoYouStart? to be accurate) from july 2018</p>

p>maeln 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Scaleway / Online.net</p>

p>openplatypus 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>OVH, Scaleway</p>

p>dilyevsky 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Equinix Metal does with 1-y commit</p>

p>dboreham 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>This page says on-demand is an option: https://metal.equinix.com/product/servers/c3-large-arm64/</p>

p>dilyevsky 41 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Maybe if you ask support, i just went to console and ondemand not showing arm in europe</p>

p>Nullabillity 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Wasn't this Scaleway's big launch a decade ago? Funny how the world comes full circle eventually…</p>

p>Yep! They launched the C1 servers in 2013 and in 2014 they were providing Docker support for them [1]. Of course, those were simple and slow chips and these are 80cores Ampere Altra, but of course, it's not the first dedicated ARM service in Europe.Note: IIRC Scaleway had their C1 servers booting from the network, not local disk, but still...1: https://blog.scaleway.com/docker-on-c1/</p>

p>These are heavy processors with 80 cores. Scaleway had entirely different proposal, more like RPi's stacked or something. I haven't seen anything like this before so interesting to see if anyone can comment on their performance/stability/etc.Check the specs here: https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/matrix-rx</p>

p>bravetraveler 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Indeed, it was a little buggy but I truly loved it. I spent way more than I probably should have on fun tiny-ARM clusters... when I was just barely no longer a teenager [and I'm much older now]</p>

p>sschueller 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Yes, although I think they were shared in vms?</p>

p>tecleandor 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Shared disk IIRC, not VMs.They had 1U servers full of boards connected to a backplane (or so it seems) [1], but the storage was shared and centralized in a SAN.https://www.cnx-software.com/2015/04/02/scaleway-provides-de...Edit: Here are some pics for the ARM modules: https://www.cnx-software.com/2014/12/30/iliads-online-labs-o...</p>

p>naniwaduni 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>> They had 1U servers full of boards connected to a backplane (or so it seems) [1], but the storage was shared and centralized in a SAN.This bit was pretty horrific and could seriously cramp your style trying to do things with those servers, too; you had to boot to a provided kernel so they could start up an nbd-client in early boot, which for extra fun you could accidentally kill while the machine was booted, which would probably force a power cycle.</p>

p>tecleandor 41 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Oh, I remember, that was a mess. IIRC there were only certain kernels available and you couldn't build modules (or at least not easily).I think I had problems to enable modules for filesystems or Docker or something like that.</p>

p>baobob 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>It doesn't look like there's much margin to be gained with these, the smallest is priced only slightly cheaper than their Ryzen machines on a threads-per-buck basis, but comes with substantially lower memory per thread.It looks like you'd always be better off buying multiples of their Ryzens rather than one of these if your workload supports horizontal partitioning</p>

p>tecleandor 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>Don't know about the Ryzen vs Ampera performance, but it's probably great if you REALLY need ARM processor, as the selection right now is limited unless you do VMs in Google Cloud or AWS.So whoever does CI/CD, testing, building... for ARM is gonna be grateful for this.</p>

p>fanf2 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Mythic Beasts have had ARM-based dedicated servers in Europe since 2017 (over 5 years ago). They have many Raspberry Pi with POE and NAS (no SD cards). (Mythic Beasts also host the Raspberry Pi web site.)https://www.mythic-beasts.com/blog/2017/03/02/hosting-a-webs...</p>

p>dboreham 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>> features the first Arm-based dedicated servers in EuropeNot? sure in what context these are "first" but Equinix Metal has had ARM servers for...definitely many years.https://metal.equinix.com/product/servers/c3-large-arm64/</p>

p>dpedu 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Hetzner looks like a great service, and I've heard a lot of good things about them. They now have a US datacenter however they are only offering cloud servers out of it. If they one day offer dedicated servers in the 'states you can bet I'd be a customer. I am fairly unhappy with OVH's ipv6 situation.</p>

p>bravetraveler 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>I've been pretty happy with them! I've been using both dedicated/cloud since before the jump to the US.IPv6 with Hetzner is a little weird, but you do get a full /64 to assign as you see fit.I can't recall exactly but the SLAAC/DHCPv6 situation seemed a little funny. It only matters if you want to configure networking differently (eg: change from NetworkManager? to systemd-networkd)In doing so you don't benefit from these profile helpers that come preinstalled, I think essentially making the cloud server its own default gateway (if memory serves)Anyway, I'm also eagerly awaiting US dedicated. While my workloads don't mind the latency to Helsinki, I do</p>

p>drcongo 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Hope this filters down to their cloud / VM offerings.</p>

p>TradingPlaces? 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>That’s the 3rd big win for Ampere. Already in Google and Oracles clouds</p>

p>Also in Microsoft Azure. So this is 4th win.The main companies that are missing from their customer list are Amazon and Alibaba.Both Amazon and Alibaba, have their own 64-big-cores or 128-medium-cores ARM server CPU designs (the 80 or 128 cores in Altra are medium cores), and both designs are superior to Altra in performance and also in ISA level support (Amazon Graviton 3 supports Armv8.4-A with SVE, while Alibaba Yitian 710 supports Armv9.0-A with SVE2).It remains to be seen whether the custom ARM cores on which the Ampere design team works for their next CPU generation will succeed to leapfrog the CPUs of Amazon and Alibaba (which are using cores licensed from the ARM company).</p>

p>raverbashing 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Any Ampere vs M1/M2 comparisons I wonder...</p>

p>TradingPlaces? 41 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Quickly, what I found on Geekbench browser. 80 core Altra vs. Macbook Pro M2: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/15913010?baseli...Pretty much as I expected with M2 winning single core and Altra winning multi. But if you look at the individual multicore tests, certain ones the M2 seems to be optimized for (camera, PDF rendering), and it blows away Altra. Probably the audio-video-photo units on the M2.Really not the best comparison, imo, because they are built for different ends. Still interesting</p>

p>Kukumber 41 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>They are definitely not the firsthttps://www.ikoula. com/en/dedicated-server/raspberry-pi-4-mi...Scaleway was the first to offer ARM based servers (non dedicated)https://blog.scaleway.com/scaleway-become-the-first-arm-base... (2015)</p>

p>lma21 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>They should up the network to 10 GBit/s. Given the price and specs of those servers, one can build a powerful bare-metal cluster there...</p>

p>PaywallBuster? 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>Would be good if they offer it upfront or as an add-on during orderbut currently you can request it as referred here https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/general-info... https://886.lv/ </p>

p>I'd also probably order the 10G for that price if it was just a checkbox in the order process. But opening a ticket later (and downtime for the server), or waiting substantially longer for the server to be available isn't really an option for me. I'm wondering if they deliberately do that because their switches couldn't handle too many 10G servers?</p>

p>nixgeek 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Right now the option you’d usually use for 10G to the internet doesn’t say it supports RX-line servers.If you search for “10G dedicated uplink” and look in the rightmost column it covers what they will support requests on.I’ve successfully used it on AX and SX many times and I’d be happy to see Hetzner also support RX!</p>

p>chmod775 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Didn't OVH/Soyoustart offer ARM based systems a few years ago?I faintly remember ARM Cortexs back in 2015 or 2016.</p>

p>bravetraveler 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Was really excited to see something more reminiscent of the Scaleway era -- small 4-16 core ARM boxes with modest memory/storage/networkNot quite sure how to phrase my reaction. Not really disappointed, but I suppose confused. Something this beefed up I'd probably rather have Epyc</p>

p>GekkePrutser? 41 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>This is not true. I had an ARM based server from scaleway in Paris years ago.</p>

p>iasay 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>These guys have been doing it for a while now: https://vboxx.eu/mac-hosting</p>

p>dx034 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>Hetzner has also been offering arm based macs for a while now. Maybe they don't include them in their definition because technically they're not servers?</p>

p>iasay 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>They're not really any different to a Sun pizza box and we used them as servers back in the day :)</p>

p>But I believe the mac mini doesn't have ECC Ram? I've had pretty bad experiences with non-ecc for database servers. It probably doesn't matter as much if you're only processing data where a bit flip isn't problematic or where data isn't stored aftewards (e.g. web server), but for data manipulation I wouldn't use non-ECC.</p>

p>spockz 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>I would like to get just a few cores. No need for 80 cores at full time. Primary use case is compiling Java apps to native binaries using graalvm.</p>

p>dindresto 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>I am sure a Hetzner Cloud server offering based on this is a given, might just have to wait until next year.</p>

p>nwh5jg56df 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Can't you cross compile these apps?</p>

p>weberer 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>Then wouldn't a VPS be good enough?</p>

p>hamburglar 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>OCI sells Arm-based bare metal servers too.</p>

p>throwaway81523 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Several low end providers have offered Raspberry Pi hosting in EU and elsewhere for quite a while.</p>

p>miohtama 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>What are the best payloads for these servers? What applications can utilise 80 ARM cores well?</p>

p>freemint 41 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>I had really great experience using SAT solvers on these machines. It was a dual socket 80 core ampere system https://twitter.com/Anno0770/status/1527414408242155523?t=AV... .</p>

p>jcuenod 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>crypto miners of course ;)</p>

p>miohtama 41 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>I do not think any relevant cryptocurrency is using CPUs anymore. Further, most of the top blockchains now run on proof-of-stake consensus.</p>

p>mnd999 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Pretty sure mythic beasts has been offering raspberry pi servers for some time.</p>

p>fariszr 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>Hmm, I expected it to be cheaper. Maybe when they launch a VPS based on ARM.</p>

p>zimpenfish 42 days ago prev next [-]</p>

p>"the low price of ? 169 a month and ? 179 setup fee"Yikes. Although it is 80-core, 128GB, I suppose.</p>

p>adrian_b 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>The prices seem reasonable for a dedicated server.That means a little above EUR 4000 for 2 years, which is around the minimum that would be paid for a server with Epyc or Xeon of similar capacity (when you assemble it yourself, at Dell or HP it would be much more expensive).The equivalence with Epyc/Xeon also depends a lot on the intended applications, for scientific computing a 32 cores/64 threads Epyc/Xeon might have a similar performance, while for a Web server or database server a 64 cores/128 threads Epyc might be needed to exceed the performance of the 80-core Altra CPU, and a server like that might cost as much as 4 years of renting.So if you buy your own server and you use it for at least 5 years, then you would certainly spend much less than when renting.However, renting a server like this can cost less when you are not certain over long-term perspectives and it also has the advantage that there is no large one-time payment.</p>

p>moonchrome 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>You're comparing price of buying vs renting with power/network/etc. included in cost ?</p>

p>I have just compared the price of buying.Adding the electrical energy cost will tip the balance towards renting, but the energy cost varies a lot from place to place. For a server so expensive it is likely that the energy cost over its lifetime will be a relatively small fraction of the buying price.The energy cost becomes much more important for those who buy 1000 servers at heavily discounted prices.The price for the Internet link can vary a lot and I do not think that it is included in the rental price quoted above. I believe that it will be paid separately, depending on requirements, and it is likely that it would not differ much from what you would pay when having your own server.</p>

p>xuki 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>What you're describing is colocation and it's not cheap. Hetzner also take care of the hardware for you, if there is anything wrong with hardware they fix it.</p>

p>adrian_b 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>If someone needs colocation, i.e. the rental of a space for the server, then that will of course increase the likelihood that renting a server is more advantageous than buying a server.However there are many who have their own server rooms, so they do not need to rent any extra space for a server.</p>

p>moonchrome 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>From what I understand the 1GB/s uncapped internet connection is included in price.</p>

p>joyfylbanana 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>It is not that pricy if you look at the beefiest intel/amd machines. However you really have to get better performance from these to justify the price. Unless core count is somehow more important to the specific use case.</p>

p>rakoo 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>I suppose a simple server with very little computing (web, irc, stuff like that) should benefit from this</p>

p>Much cheaper than a comparable x64 machine. But only if you can use 80 cores.</p>

p>pjerem 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Using 80 (or x) cores is pretty easy in any web (or network) workload where non blocking multi threading is the norm.</p>

p>rvnx 42 days ago prev [-]</p>

p>Google Cloud offers Ampere servers in multiple regions under label T2A for quite some time now and probably Alibaba Cloud / Huawei Cloud (haven't verified) and others</p>

p>baobob 42 days ago parent next [-]</p>

p>None of these are European companies. It already matters to some today, but due to policy pushes within Europe over the next 10 years it is going to matter to a whole lot more</p>

p>esseti 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>that's a point that many (too many) people misses right now. it will cause a lot of problem. If someone is able to reproduce (somehow) what AWS / Google does fro cloud, but with an EU company, they will have a lot of new customers very soon.</p>

p>rvnx 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>It's a common confusion, but when you contract with Google Cloud, the service is provided by "Google Cloud EMEA Limited, Ireland", which is an European company, and when they provide you with a datacenter in Europe they are totally an European company operating in Europe.This is different for example to DigitalOcean? LLC, that is a US-entity providing service to European customers (this example has to be verified, but that's what I remember).</p>

p>openplatypus 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Google Cloud EMEA Limited, Ireland is subsidiary of US entity. It could just as well could be a US company with respect to privacy laws and regulations.</p>

p>baobob 42 days ago root parent prev next [-]</p>

p>This is a distinction that will be increasingly lost on EU regulators, more so than it already is today.</p>

p>waffleiron 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>It is lost on regulators due to CLOUD act. The parent company still can access the personal data stored by subsidiaries.</p>

p>dx034 42 days ago parent prev next [-]</p>

p>They only offer virtual servers, not dedicated servers. In the end it shouldn't matter too much, but dedicated servers tend to be much cheaper.</p>

p>joyfylbanana 42 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>Also some people might prefer dedicated over virtual for whatever reasons.</p>

p>dx034 41 days ago root parent next [-]</p>

p>It can be an extra layer of security. At some point in the future there will probably be another exploit in supervisors or hardware that can be used to spy on other tenants. With dedicated servers that becomes harder.I've heard of large companies that require their own hosts. But then again, if you're big enough it really makes sense to build your private cloud anyway.</p>
トップ   編集 凍結 差分 バックアップ 添付 複製 名前変更 リロード   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS
Last-modified: 2022-09-15 (木) 08:32:32 (590d)